Wow. Just Wow. The past couple of years have been nothing short of wild—again. From rapidly shifting interest rate policies and global inflation battles to AI mania, geopolitical conflicts, tech layoffs, supply chain dislocations, crypto chaos, a banking sector scare, plus the recent threat of US tariffs—it’s been a relentless ride. The headlines haven’t slowed: multiple wars, persistent inflation, surprise rate hikes and pauses, collapsing regional banks, record-breaking tech rallies, commodity volatility, and “meme stocks” refusing to go away. It’s enough to make even the most seasoned forecaster rethink their models. If we’ve learned anything, it’s this: markets don’t care about your assumptions.

No algorithm, AI model, or Wall Street vet saw all this coming. Just like before, unpredictable shocks continue to shape not only markets but our broader outlook on risk, security, and economic stability. And once again, the greatest market risk remains the unknown. KRM22 Risk Manager assists risk teams in staying in front of market anomalies.

Markets digest new information constantly, but not always logically or proportionately. Sometimes they shrug, sometimes they panic. The point isn’t predicting how the market should react—it’s being prepared for how it might. Because reaction magnitude matters just as much as direction, and managing risk demands a plan for both.

Known vs. Unknown: Managing “Event Risk”

Managing risk around known events—Fed decisions, jobs reports, earnings season, OPEC meetings—can be approached systematically. We lean on historical analytics, implied volatility cues, and correlation studies. And while surprises still happen, we at least know when the event occurs. That alone helps frame and contain potential outcomes.

But it’s the unknowns that really challenge risk frameworks. Geopolitical shocks, systemic failures, black swans—these aren’t just hard to predict, they often break the models we use to manage risk in the first place. In this environment, creativity becomes just as important as math.

Let’s walk through two modern risk scenarios:

A) Short-Term Shock Scenario

Takeaways: Volatility Spikes, Transient Impact, and Front-Loaded Risk

Let’s use the March 2024 surprise crude oil supply disruption as an example. A sudden escalation in the Middle East sent oil prices spiking 25% in a matter of days. Futures spreads exploded, energy stocks soared, and volatility surged across the curve—but especially in the front end. Within weeks, as tensions cooled and emergency supplies were released, prices retraced most of the move.

This is a classic short-term spike—brief, intense, and directionally clear.

To model this kind of risk, risk managers can apply exaggerated price and volatility shocks to the front months of affected assets (e.g., oil, nat gas, regional power markets) while leaving back months relatively untouched using KRM22 risk templates. These front-loaded scenarios should include 2x to 5x increases in implied volatilities to stress-test portfolios for “short gamma” exposure.

Even if the event feels improbable or rare, it’s crucial to have daily visibility into these “front-month shock” scenarios. As we’ve seen, all it takes is one geopolitical flare-up to expose weaknesses in a portfolio.

B) Long-Term Uncertainty Scenario

Takeaways: Enduring Uncertainty, Flight to Safety, Correlation Breakdowns

Contrast that with the ongoing inflation + rate policy uncertainty gripping markets today. Will inflation remain sticky? How far will central banks go to suppress it? Are we heading for stagflation or a soft landing? Is AI-fuelled productivity going to change the game?

Unlike a one-off shock, this is a slow-moving, global uncertainty. It’s not about when something will happen—it’s about navigating a fog that won’t lift.

Modelling this kind of scenario requires assumptions around prolonged volatility and stress across the curve—not just in front months, but 1, 2, even 5 years out. In these moments, traditional correlations break down. “Safe” assets like U.S. Treasuries, gold, and the USD might rally even while growth sectors underperform. Volatility may rise even as prices remain range bound.

To capture these risks, apply uniform shocks across expirations using KRM22 risk templates, especially in sectors prone to long-term repricing: energy, tech, real estate, and industrials. Consider shifting the entire yield curve by fixed basis point increments. Shock gold and silver uniformly. De-correlate historical relationships (e.g., stocks and bonds moving together, not opposite).

Don’t forget options: a major sentiment shift might flip skews entirely, former call-heavy (bullish) structures may suddenly price puts more aggressively. Skew and at-the-money vol shocks across tenors can highlight how sensitive a portfolio is to changing conditions.

And yes, add some extreme tail risk scenarios. Crypto’s 2022 collapse, GameStop’s 2021 short squeeze, and Nvidia’s 2023 explosion show just how far—and how fast—price can move. Price shocks of 5-10 standard deviations may sound absurd… until they happen.

Final Thoughts: Building the Muscle

Creating and re-evaluating stress scenarios are standard operating procedures…not just for compliance, but to actively discover vulnerabilities before the market forces you to see them.

Because while no one can predict the future, being unprepared isn’t an option.

A creative mix of price curve shocks, correlation decoupling, and volatility stress tests can help risk managers maintain clarity during chaos.

Markets will never stop surprising us.

KRM22’s job is clear: provide our clients the tools to always expect the unexpected.
Contact our sales team to learn more.